Qcramai combines automated testing with analyst review. Findings are checked before reporting, with reproduction steps and risk context to help teams decide what to fix.
How we operate
Every engagement begins with written scope and explicit authorization. We don't test anything we haven't been cleared to touch, and every tool run in our own pipeline enforces that same confirmation before it fires a single request.
Our methodology draws on the OWASP Testing Guide and OWASP Top 10. We tailor test coverage to the agreed scope while using consistent methods and analyst review across every engagement.
Automated tooling surfaces candidates fast; it also produces false positives. An analyst confirms real exploitability before anything is written up as a finding.
Engagements run through the Qcramai Security Console rather than ad hoc scripts — so results are consistent, reproducible, and every run is logged against the category it tested.
Findings are ordered by real business impact with clear reproduction steps — and we retest once fixes ship, rather than closing the loop with a PDF.
Happy to walk through our methodology in detail before you commit to anything.